b5media.com

Advertise with us

Enjoying this blog? Check out the rest of the Entertainment Channel Subscribe to this Feed

The Gryffindor Gazette

Invisibility cloak? Impossible, says physicist

by Wendy on April 1st, 2008

According to Michio Kaku, a physicist specializing in string theory at the City College of New York, Harry Potter’s invisibility cloak is nice in theory but impossible to duplicate in real life. Well, at least for now. Here’s what he has to say:

….an invisibility shield is potentially possible, and Kaku explains how, but since it can’t be seen through from the inside, eyeholes would be needed. Perhaps disembodied floating eyes would be less inconspicuous than a whole visible person. But then again, one could listen, or even mind-read. While we might someday be able to read the vague tenor of another’s thoughts, Kaku says, the details may be forever inaccessible.

And though it may not spark any story ideas, there is a certain grim satisfaction to finding out that to make Harry Potter invisible without a special shield “one would have to liquefy him, boil him to create steam, crystallize him, heat him again, and then cool him.” Take that, boy wizard. - source

I could care less if it’s possible or not, honestly - it just makes good reading! But I don’t think that this technology will be out of our reach for too much longer, do you?

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

POSTED IN: Harry Potter props

2 opinions for Invisibility cloak? Impossible, says physicist

  • Aoife (J.K Rowling we Thank you ;)
    Apr 2, 2008 at 09:25

    eugh..who care’s :Lof course its not real..like the whole book :L

    it would be so cool though =]

  • hermioneg247
    Apr 2, 2008 at 19:55

    if only it could really happen…
    but who cares if it’s possible or not– a lot of things in harry potter can’t happen and it’s still enjoyable– for example i can’t just walk up to something, wave a stick at it, say a couple of words and it be able to fly but it doesn’t ruin the magic of the books
    vive xe

Have an opinion? Leave a comment: